Refinement of Health App Review Tool (HART) through stakeholder interviews: HART 2.0.

The Health App Review Tool (HART) is a novel assessment designed to match users with Alzheimer's disease or related dementias (ADRD) and caregivers to mobile applications that support health and wellness. The objectives of this study were to gather stakeholder feedback on the HART and then to implement revisions. Thirteen participants completed in-depth Think Aloud interviews. Participants shared qualitative feedback on each HART item. Participant feedback was analyzed via in-depth video-audio review. Feedback was implemented as actionable HART revisions. On average, the majority of participants rated items as "adequate"; however, qualitative findings indicated the need for improvement in conciseness, clarity, and understandability. Conciseness was addressed by combining related concepts into multi-items, clarity through the addition of specific examples, and understandability through improved verbiage. The HART has been refined from 106 items to 17 items through extensive revisions to the clarity, conciseness, and explanations provided throughout the assessment.

Wheelchair mobility, motor performance and participation of adult wheelchair users with ARSACS: a cross-sectional study.

PURPOSE: Although approximately 45% of adults with Autosomal Recessive Spastic Ataxia of Charlevoix-Saguenay (ARSACS) are permanent wheelchair users, this sub population has been less studied. The purpose of this study was to document wheelchair mobility, motor performance, and participation in a cohort of adult wheelchair users with ARSACS. METHODS: We recruited 36 manual and powered wheelchair users with ARSACS, aged between 34 and 64 years, for this cross-sectional study. Participants completed measures regarding wheelchair mobility (Wheelchair Skills Test Questionnaire [WST-Q-F], Wheelchair Use Confidence Scale [WheelCon-F] and Wheelchair Outcome Measure [WhOM-F]), motor performance (Scale for the Assessment and Rating of Ataxia [SARA], Disease Severity Index for adults with ARSACS [DSI-ARSACS], Upper Extremity Performance Test for the Elderly [TEMPA], Standardised Finger to Nose Test [SFNT], grip strength, pinch strength, Lower Extremity Motor Coordination Test [LEMOCOT], Berg Balance Scale [BBS], Timed Up and Go [TUG] and 10-meter Walk Test [10mWT]), and participation (Barthel Index, LSA-F and LIFE-H). Results were compared between age groups (≤49 years and ≥50 years), types of wheelchair used, and available reference values. Correlations were computed between wheelchair mobility, upper limb function, and participation. RESULTS: Participants presented limitations regarding wheelchair skills, motor performance, and participation in daily activities. Despite preserved upper limb strength, wheelchair skills, upper and lower limb coordination, standing balance, and functional independence were generally more impaired after 50 years of age and among powered wheelchair users. Significant moderate correlations were found between wheelchair skills and self-efficacy, upper limb strength and coordination, and participation in daily and social activities. CONCLUSIONS: This study provided the first data sets describing specific characteristics of manual and powered wheelchair users with ARSACS. It supports a need to offer wheelchair skills training interventions to adults with ARSACS, which could increase their daily and social participation.IMPLICATIONS FOR REHABILITATIONAdult wheelchair users with ARSACS present with limited wheelchair skills, significantly impaired motor performance, and reduced participation that generally decreases with age. This profile may serve as comparative data for clinicians to anticipate disease progression.This study provides the first data on distinguishing characteristics between PWC users and MWC users with ARSACS. The main characteristics of PWC users include more severe functional limitations and motor impairments, as well as limited grip strength that contrasts with the general preservation of this function among other adults with ARSACS.There is a need to offer and evaluate wheelchair skills training interventions in the future for adults with ARSACS. The general preservation of grip and pinch strength observed in this population suggests a potential for improvement. Considering the associations found between wheelchair mobility and participation, such interventions may increase users' daily and social participation.

Wheelchair-mounted robotic arms: a survey of occupational therapists' practices and perspectives.

PURPOSE: Despite the benefits of wheelchair-mounted robotic arms (WMRAs), occupational therapists are not yet widely involved in the recommendation or implementation of these assistive devices. The purpose of this study was to investigate and compare the current practices and perspectives of occupational therapists who had and had not recommended a WMRA on the recommendation, training, and implementation of WMRAs. METHODS: This was a descriptive cross-sectional study. An online survey was sent to Canadian, European, and American occupational therapists who had or had not worked with WMRAs. Respondents were asked close-ended questions about their experience, role, barriers, motivations, and future needs regarding WMRAs. We compared results between respondents who had and had not recommended WMRAs using descriptive statistics. RESULTS: Ninety-three North American and European occupational therapists completed the survey. Of those, 29 (31.2%) had recommended a WMRA, mostly the JACO robotic arm (n = 26, 89.7%) in rehabilitation centres (n = 18, 62.1%). Their perspectives on their role and barriers related to WMRAs were similar to those who had never recommended a WMRA. All respondents recognised the relevance of occupational therapists' contribution, and most reported interest in WMRAs (n = 76, 81.7%). However, many barriers emerged, mainly related to limited funding (n = 49, 76.6%), lack of training and knowledge (n = 38, 59.4%), and resource constraints (n = 37, 54.4%). Future needs identified matched these barriers. CONCLUSION: This survey provides novel insight into occupational therapists' perspectives on WMRAs. It highlights that health professionals need to have easier access to funding, formal training, and resources to support their involvement with WMRAs.Implications for rehabilitationMost occupational therapists are interested in working with WMRAs, considering the potential of these devices to support individuals with upper extremity impairments in their daily activities. They also recognise their unique contribution to the assessment, recommendation, and implementation process among multidisciplinary teams.WMRA recommendation is relevant in various clinical settings and with a wide range of client populations. Nevertheless, it appears that occupational therapists working with adults, in rehabilitation centres or specialised clinics, may have more opportunities to get involved in this process and to attend formal training on this technology, as compared to other settings.Many barriers remain, impeding occupational therapists' role in the recommendation and implementation of WMRAs. Addressing these barriers may increase the number of devices that are successfully adopted and utilised by individuals with upper extremity impairments. In particular, future research and health policies should focus on access to sufficient funding, formal training, and resources for occupational therapists relative to their role in recommending and implementing WMRAs.

Measurement properties of wheelchair use assessment tools in adults with autosomal recessive spastic ataxia of Charlevoix-Saguenay.

PURPOSE: To establish the reliability and construct validity of two French-Canadian versions of assessment tools for manual (MWC) and powered wheelchair (PWC) users with autosomal recessive spastic ataxia of Charlevoix-Saguenay (ARSACS): the Wheelchair Skills Test Questionnaire (WST-Q-F) version 5.0 and the Wheelchair Use Confidence Scale (WheelCon-F) Short Form. METHODS: We recruited 32 MWC and PWC users with ARSACS aged between 34 and 64 years. Participants completed measures twice within 2 weeks for test-retest reliability and to determine the standard error of measurement. Construct validity was established by verifying hypothesized relationships between wheelchair use scores and other variables regarding personal factors, body functions, and activities. Participants' scores were also compared with those of MWC and PWC users with other diagnoses to explore known-groups validity. RESULTS: Adequate to excellent test-retest reliability values were found for all questionnaires (intraclass correlation coefficients between 0.506 and 0.995). SEMs were acceptable, ranging from 3.3 to 9.1 on the WST-Q-F and from 0.7 to 1.2 on the WheelCon-F. Moderate to excellent correlations supported construct validity for the WST-Q-F and the WheelCon-F. Compared with other populations, adults with ARSACS reported limited wheelchair skills, but similar wheelchair confidence. CONCLUSIONS: The WST-Q-F and the WheelCon-F have excellent test-retest reliability, acceptable measurement errors, and support for construct validity in adults with ARSACS. This study was the first to evaluate these assessment tools in this population, and the results support a need to implement wheelchair skills training interventions in this population.IMPLICATIONS FOR REHABILITATIONThe WST-Q-F version 5.0 and the WheelCon-F Short Form are reliable and valid assessment tools to measure manual and powered wheelchair skills and self-efficacy in adults with autosomal recessive spastic ataxia of Charlevoix-Saguenay (ARSACS).The WST-Q-F version 5.0 and the WheelCon-F Short Form can be used to evaluate and describe wheelchair skills and wheelchair use self-efficacy in clinical practice and are recommended for future research in adults with ARSACS. These outcome tools may be especially useful to measure the effects of a wheelchair training program.

Using affinity purification coupled with stable isotope labeling by amino acids in cell culture quantitative mass spectrometry to identify novel interactors/substrates of protein arginine methyltransferases.

The protein arginine methyltransferase family (PRMT) is known as being the catalytic driving force for arginine methylation. This specific type of post translational modification is extensively used in biological processes, and therefore is highly relevant in the pathology of a profusion of diseases. Since altered PRMT expression or deregulation has been shown to contribute to a vast range of those diseases including cancer, their study is of great interest. Although an increasing number of substrates are being discovered for each PRMT, large scale proteomic methods can be used to identify novel interactors/substrates, further elucidating the role that PRMTs perform in physiological or disease states. Here, we describe the use of affinity purification (AP) coupled with stable isotope labeling with amino acids in cell culture (SILAC) quantitative mass spectrometry (MS) to identify protein interactors and substrates of PRMTs. We also explore the possibility of exploiting the fact most PRMTs display lower dissociation rates with their hypomethylated substrates as a strategy to increase the proportion of substrates identified in AP/MS studies.